<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hockey Photography: A How-To Guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hockeyshirtshop.com/blog/2009/07/06/how-to-take-hockey-action-photography-tips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hockeyshirtshop.com/blog/2009/07/06/how-to-take-hockey-action-photography-tips/</link>
	<description>Hockey t-shirts, stories and stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 04:59:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://hockeyshirtshop.com/blog/2009/07/06/how-to-take-hockey-action-photography-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 04:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyshirtshop.com/blog/?p=112#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Nice little article.  I didn&#039;t personally learn much from it beyond what I already know, but it&#039;s always nice to get another person&#039;s perspective on things, especially when it comes to stuff like lenses.

I know the most recent comments are 6 months old, but I have a few thoughts.  For WB, I usually take a custom reading off the ice.  The lighting is actually pretty even at the local rinks, so this seems to work well.  Even if the light varies a bit, it should stay close enough to fix it up in post-processing.

As for exposure settings, probably the best option is to expose off of a gray card and leave it at that.  Again, your mileage may vary depending on the lighting at your rink.  It takes a lot of practice, and some intuition to get it right and much of the time the exposure just isn&#039;t going to be right anyway.

If you don&#039;t have a gray card, try exposing off of a player&#039;s face (that&#039;s really what you&#039;re after anyway -- there&#039;s so much emotion in hockey, and the expression on a player&#039;s face is hands down the best way to capture that), or use your hand.  My hand is about two stops over the gray card exposure.

If I may make a recommendation, a place called lensrentals.com provides rentals for numerous lenses, cameras, and accessories, so that may be a good way to go to try things out.  Better to spend $40 to rent a Canon 70-200 for four days than $1200+ to buy one to find out you hate shooting hockey.  They have a huge inventory (or so they claim), good customer service, and fast turnaround.  Just make sure you pay the extra few bucks for the damage waiver!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice little article.  I didn&#8217;t personally learn much from it beyond what I already know, but it&#8217;s always nice to get another person&#8217;s perspective on things, especially when it comes to stuff like lenses.</p>
<p>I know the most recent comments are 6 months old, but I have a few thoughts.  For WB, I usually take a custom reading off the ice.  The lighting is actually pretty even at the local rinks, so this seems to work well.  Even if the light varies a bit, it should stay close enough to fix it up in post-processing.</p>
<p>As for exposure settings, probably the best option is to expose off of a gray card and leave it at that.  Again, your mileage may vary depending on the lighting at your rink.  It takes a lot of practice, and some intuition to get it right and much of the time the exposure just isn&#8217;t going to be right anyway.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t have a gray card, try exposing off of a player&#8217;s face (that&#8217;s really what you&#8217;re after anyway &#8212; there&#8217;s so much emotion in hockey, and the expression on a player&#8217;s face is hands down the best way to capture that), or use your hand.  My hand is about two stops over the gray card exposure.</p>
<p>If I may make a recommendation, a place called lensrentals.com provides rentals for numerous lenses, cameras, and accessories, so that may be a good way to go to try things out.  Better to spend $40 to rent a Canon 70-200 for four days than $1200+ to buy one to find out you hate shooting hockey.  They have a huge inventory (or so they claim), good customer service, and fast turnaround.  Just make sure you pay the extra few bucks for the damage waiver!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://hockeyshirtshop.com/blog/2009/07/06/how-to-take-hockey-action-photography-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyshirtshop.com/blog/?p=112#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for contributing, Chris. You are far more ambitious than I with the goal mounted camera. You would most definitely get some awesome shots if you can work that out. Hopefully someone will pitch in some advice on the topic. I&#039;d love to know more about it myself. Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for contributing, Chris. You are far more ambitious than I with the goal mounted camera. You would most definitely get some awesome shots if you can work that out. Hopefully someone will pitch in some advice on the topic. I&#8217;d love to know more about it myself. Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://hockeyshirtshop.com/blog/2009/07/06/how-to-take-hockey-action-photography-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyshirtshop.com/blog/?p=112#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the thoughts.  I have been shooting in a variety of rinks and finally hit upon the correct White Balance and speed settings to make the pictures acceptable.  Normally the setting is somewhere between 3500 and 4000 k if your camera can adjust K value.  

My next challenge is to figure out how to mount a camera inside the goal.  I have all of the necessary remote equipment, but I looking for a box to protect the camera.  They are used in the NHL, but I cannot find one on line.  Any one have an idea before I build one myself.  

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the thoughts.  I have been shooting in a variety of rinks and finally hit upon the correct White Balance and speed settings to make the pictures acceptable.  Normally the setting is somewhere between 3500 and 4000 k if your camera can adjust K value.  </p>
<p>My next challenge is to figure out how to mount a camera inside the goal.  I have all of the necessary remote equipment, but I looking for a box to protect the camera.  They are used in the NHL, but I cannot find one on line.  Any one have an idea before I build one myself.  </p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://hockeyshirtshop.com/blog/2009/07/06/how-to-take-hockey-action-photography-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyshirtshop.com/blog/?p=112#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the nice comment, Alicia. Glad I could be of some help.
You also ask a great question about metering. I would actually love to hear some other opinions on that topic. But for what it&#039;s worth, here&#039;s what I do. . .

I use Evaluative metering and then overexpose by one stop to compensate for the bright white ice. I basically try to get the best exposure of the players&#039; faces as possible. With this in mind, I also use a single autofocus point (top center) so that I am zeroing my focus in on the player&#039;s face. Because of the very narrow depth-of-field you get at around f/2, this helps me get their faces in focus.

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the nice comment, Alicia. Glad I could be of some help.<br />
You also ask a great question about metering. I would actually love to hear some other opinions on that topic. But for what it&#8217;s worth, here&#8217;s what I do. . .</p>
<p>I use Evaluative metering and then overexpose by one stop to compensate for the bright white ice. I basically try to get the best exposure of the players&#8217; faces as possible. With this in mind, I also use a single autofocus point (top center) so that I am zeroing my focus in on the player&#8217;s face. Because of the very narrow depth-of-field you get at around f/2, this helps me get their faces in focus.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alicia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyshirtshop.com/blog/2009/07/06/how-to-take-hockey-action-photography-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Alicia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyshirtshop.com/blog/?p=112#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Your site has been very helpful - as hockey and photographer &quot;want to be&quot; it has enlightened me on a couple things - 1 - the lens - I have to bite the bullet and get the right lens instead of continuing to be frustrated with my cheapo!  Darnit anyway - if I would have done that in the first place i probably would have saved myself alot of time and frustrations!!!!! Thanks again for the great pointers!  Any thoughts on how I should set the metering? Evaluative, Partial, or Center Weighted?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your site has been very helpful &#8211; as hockey and photographer &#8220;want to be&#8221; it has enlightened me on a couple things &#8211; 1 &#8211; the lens &#8211; I have to bite the bullet and get the right lens instead of continuing to be frustrated with my cheapo!  Darnit anyway &#8211; if I would have done that in the first place i probably would have saved myself alot of time and frustrations!!!!! Thanks again for the great pointers!  Any thoughts on how I should set the metering? Evaluative, Partial, or Center Weighted?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://hockeyshirtshop.com/blog/2009/07/06/how-to-take-hockey-action-photography-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyshirtshop.com/blog/?p=112#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Wow! Finally, an easy-to-understand walk-through of how to shoot hockey photos! This is exactly what I&#039;ve been looking for, a no-bs-here&#039;s-what-you-need-to-do-this explanation in layman&#039;s terms.

Thank you so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Finally, an easy-to-understand walk-through of how to shoot hockey photos! This is exactly what I&#8217;ve been looking for, a no-bs-here&#8217;s-what-you-need-to-do-this explanation in layman&#8217;s terms.</p>
<p>Thank you so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
